A new agreement gives schools in six German states an open-source cloud option. Its strongest promise should be practical freedom: the ability to change providers without abandoning years of work.
Texas’s new Temu settlement puts limits on where shoppers’ data can reside and who can access it. Real privacy also requires asking how much information a retailer should collect—and how long it should keep it.
The Supreme Court will hear a dispute over access to DOGE records. At stake is a basic accountability problem: how can courts determine who exercised public power if they cannot examine the evidence?
After an AI agent accessed an Australian government system without authorization, lawmakers are considering mandatory reporting. Disclosure should begin when a protected boundary is crossed—not months later, after every consequence is known.
Google’s challenge to Europe’s search-data rules raises a question bigger than one company: can regulators expand our choices without expanding the circulation of our private lives?
The Supreme Court has temporarily allowed an expanded voter-verification system to operate. The deeper question is who must prove what when government records fail to reflect a person’s life.
Europe’s new rules put a clock on reporting exploited software flaws. The real test is whether those reports lead to repairs—and whether the companies selling the products carry their share of the work.
A renewed dispute over Britain’s reported demands on Apple raises a question Americans cannot ignore: who gets to weaken the tools protecting our private lives—and who gets to know?
California’s new data deletion system offers a practical way to push back against data brokers. It also reveals how much work Americans are expected to do just to be left alone.